I have a Plex media server PC that I run at home where I store movies, TV shows, etc. to watch on TV. It currently has a 1TB m.2 SSD for the OS
and a 3TB HDD for movies & TV shows & such. Recently I've been able to fill up the HDD, so I had to remove some things, but I decided to buy a bigger HDD for it. I went for an 18TB HDD, so hopefully that should
last a while.. But I can hear someone say sarcastically "18TB ought to
be enough for anyone", and I'll probably fill it up eventually.
Nightfox
I have a Plex media server PC that I run at home where I store
What OS are you running? depending on what it is you could be using ZFS and then you can basically JBOD everything and just keep adding as you go.
What OS are you running? depending on what it is you could be using ZFS and then you can basically JBOD everything and just keep adding as you
go. If your in windows you can't really do that but if I remember from when I had a plex server you could have multiple locations. This way
you can still have JBOD. No back up options this way though.
I have Linux installed on it. I'm not familiar with ZFS or JBOD..?
Nightfox
Can you do that with ZFS efficiently? You need to add each device as a VDEV, and then it stripes everything over all devices if I recall correctly, so getting it to use all the space might be tricky.
I'd recommend BTRFS for that. It has a mode much closer to JBOD than
ZFS. You can use all the space of a hodge podge of various size disks
and is much more amenable to ad hoc additions, removals and alterations.
claw wrote to boraxman <=-
I'd recommend BTRFS for that. It has a mode much closer to JBOD than
ZFS. You can use all the space of a hodge podge of various size disks
and is much more amenable to ad hoc additions, removals and alterations.
BTRFS is also another solution. The good and bad thing about Linux is there are usually 10 ways to do the same thing.
Depends how you set it up initially. Using it with JBOD will not get a performance boost because its not striping anything.
BTRFS is also another solution. The good and bad thing about Linux is there are usually 10 ways to do the same thing.
A bit of searching and you will find all kinds of mixed reviews and why one person like this or that. A little research and you will find what fits you.
Heres a reddit discussion on which is better. But at this time both
have been around for years and are fairly solid. https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/9z7h7u/zfs_vs_btrfs/
Heres an article from TrueNAS https://www.truenas.com/blog/open-zfs-vs-btrfs/
In the end its really not going to make too much difference for you. If you were some enterprise looking for their next solution I would suggest testing both and learning both. Since your not Google a bit and do what feels comfortable.
I don't have much experience with BTRFS. But there are so many guides
out there how both of these work. If your using Linux already your
smart enough to use either of these technologies.
I have a Plex media server PC that I run at home where I store movies, TV shows, etc. to watch on TV. It currently has a 1TB m.2 SSD for the OS and
a 3TB HDD for movies & TV shows & such. Recently I've been able to fill up the HDD, so I had to remove some things, but I decided to buy a bigger HDD for it. I went for an 18TB HDD, so hopefully that should last a while..
But I can hear someone say sarcastically "18TB ought to be enough for anyone", and I'll probably fill it up eventually.
Thanks for the pointers. I'm running SHR1 on my Synology NAS, am interested in learning more about ZFS and BTRFS - the newer Synology units support BTRFS, and proxmox uses ZFS as part of its clustering feature.
It sounds like with proxmox you could create a ZFS pool out of two server's local storage, set up clustering, and it'll auto-failover a
node when a server fails.
boraxman wrote to poindexter FORTRAN <=-
Try looking at reddit.com/r/datahoarder, these guys store heaps of
data, being datahoarders so there is some combined experience here.
I have a Plex media server PC that I run at home where I store movies, TV shows, etc. to watch on TV. It currently has a 1TB m.2 SSD for the OS
a while.. But I can hear someone say sarcastically "18TB ought to be enough for anyone", and I'll probably fill it up eventually.
I'm getting an Asustor for a similar setup, as I try and figure out how to sync important data across devices and also not run out of space anywhere.
I'm still trying to mentally figure out how I want the situation to work. I'm not really sure what I envision, but I'm hopeful it includes
filling up the drives in that, and not on my laptop or desktop.
It feels weird, here, where all our messages and ANSI graphics and whatnot can generally fairly comfortably fit into a very small place (depending on what our retention policies and file bases look like I suppose).
a while.. But I can hear someone say sarcastically "18TB ought to be enough for anyone", and I'll probably fill it up eventually.
First up, aloe vera, or is that the Adeptus Astartes. :) You've been quiet for a bit.
I have a Thecus device filling that role. At the time I bought 2 new 8TB drives to put in it. I did have a massive amount of monolithic data
tied up in video, unfortunately I lost most of it while playing around with mergerfs so it lies heavily under utilised.
base, but the rest of it is pretty random, odd music, applications. I
have to get around and pack it away into the NAS preiodically.
Mine are hanging out of a ~40Mb NFS share... handy to just mount the
share in a virtual system and run it from there.
the Gb range of hard drives space started to exceed my ability to fill, and I find that is much the case even now. Aforementioned loss of data partially to blame but I don't acquire data at the same rate I used to.
Sysop: | Gary Ailes |
---|---|
Location: | Pittsburgh, PA |
Users: | 106 |
Nodes: | 5 (0 / 5) |
Uptime: | 105:09:08 |
Calls: | 588 |
Files: | 2,171 |
Messages: | 64,950 |